drumbeat insofar

Monday, July 9, 2012

Jenny McCarthy Continues Killing Kids (Theagitator)

Share With Friends:

| Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/237403086?client_source=feed&format=rss

rose bowl 2012 sat cheating scandal hangover cure lebron james engaged auld lang syne end of the world 2012 pink martini

Friday, July 6, 2012

Kids and laughing teachers bullied suicide teen

[ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]

[ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/kids-laughing-teachers-bullied-suicide-teen-143011024--abc-news-topstories.html

doug fister rick warren the perfect storm hard boiled eggs

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Djokovic, Federer book semi-final showdown

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/federer-record-32nd-grand-slam-semi-final-142117306--ten.html

john edwards conocophillips capitals guy fieri ryan braun bryce harper may day

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Obama Air Force One Call Reveals Fundraising Concerns

President Obama is feeling the pressure to compete financially with Mitt Romney in the 2012 election, despite his inherent advantage as an incumbent.

The GOP challenger is running neck-in-neck with him in both polls and fundraising, leaving Obama sounding the alarm to his deep-pocketed backers.

And after smashing records in 2008, raising over $746 million from a historic donor roll of 3 million names, Obama appears on pace to do it again.

Still, Obama and Democrats are sounding the alarm for what would seem to be unthinkable: behind outraised and outspent by Romney in 2012.

"We see where we stand, and right now on a month-to-month basis, we've fallen behind," Obama told donors on a call direct from Air Force One.

"We just can't be outspent 10 to 1," Obama said, according to The Daily Beast.

"That's what happened in Wisconsin recently. The Koch brothers and their allies spent more than the other side's entire campaign, our side's entire campaign."

"We are going to see more money spent on negative ads through these super PACs and anonymous outside groups than ever before. And if things continue as they have so far, I'll be the first sitting president in modern history to be outspent."

An Obama campaign official confirmed the veracity of the recording to ABC News, but described the discussion with donors as a "routine finance call."

The President uses a non-taxpayer-funded phone for such calls, he added.

Obama's message - that he could be the first incumbent president outspent - seeks to instill a sense of urgency in supporters as the election approaches.

The good news for the President: He received a boost last week when the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare. The bad news: So did Romney.

For whom would you vote today?

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/07/obama-air-force-one-call-reveals-fundraising-concerns/

world peace world peace lakers colorectal cancer metta kashi neil diamond orange crush

Deep integration in free trade agreements in China and India

Since the 2000s, creeping protectionism and the stalled WTO Doha Round trade talks have prompted China and India to pursue a variety of bilateral and regional free trade agreements (FTAs). Before 2000, the sole FTA involving China and India was the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement. By February 2012, the Asian giants were among the region?s leaders in trade agreements with 12 FTAs in effect in China and 13 in India. These figures are likely to rise as both giants are presently negotiating increasingly ambitious FTAs. Since 2007, India has been involved in negotiations with the EU on an FTA that seeks to sharply reduce tariffs on goods and liberalise services and investments provisions. China is in talks with Japan and Korea on a trilateral FTA, which some see as a rival to the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) process.

These moves have prompted concerns about the shallow coverage of the giants? FTAs, which are said to be quite liberalising when it comes to trade in goods, but quite thin and vague in services as well as new issues compared to most agreements formed in the Americas or across the Pacific (e.g. Dent 2006; Suominen 2009). Are these concerns valid? And what should be done?

Evaluating the depth of given FTAs against best practices is difficult for two reasons.

First, it requires detailed and often painstaking examination of the legal texts of FTAs. This requires specialist legal skills and the ability to generalise across agreements.
Second, there is no internationally-accepted methodology for assessing the depth of FTA provisions against best practices.

One way forward is to attempt to evaluate the compatibility of China?s and India?s FTAs against existing (or future) global rules. This approach has shed light on the depth of FTAs in Asia (Plummer 2007; Wignaraja and Lazaro 2010). Following in this tradition, my recent research has used some simple legal and economic evaluation criteria to assess the giants? FTAs according to tariff elimination on the goods trade, coverage of services sectors, and coverage of trade issues beyond goods and services (Wignaraja 2011 and 2012):

The tariff elimination criteria reflected Article 24 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). FTAs that eliminated tariffs on at least 85% of tariff lines (of either or all FTA partners) within ten years are WTO-compliant. Thus an FTA that eliminates 85% of tariff lines within ten years is classed as a relatively fast approach to tariff liberalisation, while others are considered gradual.
The criteria for services liberalisation relied on the coverage of sectors included in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). FTAs that covered five key sectors of the GATS were considered comprehensive. Those with less than five sectors were categorised as partial, and those without any coverage as ?no provision.?
New trade issues are those regulatory issues beyond goods and services. The four so-called Singapore issues in the context of WTO negotiations ? investment, competition policy, government procurement, and trade facilitation ? are convenient for examining trade issues beyond goods and services. FTAs that covered three or four Singapore issues were regarded as comprehensive, and the remainder as partial or no provision.

The Singapore issues refer to four working groups set up during the WTO Ministerial Conference of 1996 in Singapore. These groups are tasked with four key issues: (1) transparency in government procurement, (2) trade facilitation (customs issues), (3) trade and investment, and (4) trade and competition. The four Singapore issues were conditionally included in the work programme for the Doha Development Round global trade talks, but were dropped at the WTO Ministerial Conference in Canc?n in 2004.

The results of the evaluation of the giants? FTAs in terms of existing or future global rules are shown in Figure 1. Legal texts from the Asian Development Bank (ADB)?s FTA database were used for the evaluation. The key findings are below.

Figure 1. Depth of FTAs in the China and India as of February 2012

Source: Author's updates based on Wignaraja (2011 and 2012).

The overall depth of giants? trade agreements varies considerably, encompassing a mix of deep FTAs and shallower FTAs. Of the giants? 25 FTAs in effect, 13 have a relatively fast approach to tariff liberalisation, four comprehensively cover services, and three comprehensively cover the Singapore issues. The remaining FTAs were of two main types: (i) those that had a gradual approach to tariff liberalisation and partially covered services as well as Singapore issues; or (ii) those that had a gradual approach to tariff liberalisation but typically excluded services and Singapore issues.

Encouragingly, the giants? recent FTAs typically show more depth than earlier agreements. The giants? deepest agreements have a relatively fast approach to tariff liberalisation, comprehensively cover services, and comprehensively cover the Singapore issues (covering three or all four issues). This category includes: the 2011 People?s Republic of China-Costa Rica FTA, the 2011 India-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and the 2011 Japan-India CEPA. The conclusion of these deep agreements suggest a conscious move by the giants towards the comprehensive liberalisation standards for new issues visible in best FTAs in the Asia-Pacific (e.g. the Korea-EU FTA). This is indeed a step in the right direction.

In terms of the speed of tariff liberalisation, FTAs in China seem better than in India. Eight (67%) of China?s FTAs have a relatively fast approach to tariff liberalisation compared with only five (39%) for India. Some examples are useful to highlight differences in the giants? approaches with their trading partners. Under the People?s Republic of China-Singapore FTA, 95% of China?s tariff lines are eliminated within one year. Singapore, of course, has virtually zero tariffs for most items, and tariff elimination is not considered a major trade policy issue. The New Zealand-People?s Republic of China FTA allows for immediate elimination of 35% of China?s tariff lines upon entry into force (i.e. when the agreement became legally binding on 1 October 2008) and 96% within eight years. The ASEAN-People?s Republic of China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) allows for longer adjustment periods for least developed countries (LDCs) and, accordingly, eliminates 90% of the tariff lines of China and the ASEAN-6 economies within five years, while the economies of Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam have ten years. Meanwhile, the India-Korea CEPA liberalises 75% of India?s tariff lines within eight years and 93% of South Korea?s. The India-Singapore CECA immediately eliminates tariffs on 80% of the value of India?s imports from Singapore.

Services coverage seems better in China?s FTAs but India is making progress. The China-Singapore FTA allows for comprehensive coverage of services, while another nine of China?s FTAs partially liberalise services. The People?s Republic of China-Singapore agreement significantly builds on the ASEAN-People?s Republic of China CECA by allowing for the movement of natural persons. Otherwise known as ?Mode 4?, this covers the international supply of services through the movement of service suppliers (e.g. independent professionals) or those who work for a service supplier. Many of India?s early agreements typically placed little emphasis on services with eight FTAs excluding provisions on services. Nonetheless, India?s newer agreements have sought to rectify this issue. India?s FTAs with major east Asian economies (Japan, Korea and Singapore) provide for comprehensive services coverage while the agreement with Malaysia provides for partial coverage. Furthermore, in a move to extend services coverage to the South Asian level, the SAARC Agreement on Trade in Services was signed in April 2010.

There is selective coverage of the Singapore issues in the giants? FTAs, indicating a cautious approach to new trade issues. Seven of China?s FTAs cover one or two Singapore issues. For instance, investment and trade facilitation are both covered in the New Zealand-People?s Republic of China FTA and the People?s Republic of China-Peru FTA, while the People?s Republic of China-Pakistan FTA and People?s Republic of China-Taipei,China Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) cover only investment. The newer People's Republic of China-Costa Rica FTA goes even further by including provisions on trade facilitation, investment and competition policy. More sensitive issues of government procurement and competition policy, however, are typically absent from China?s FTAs. Meanwhile, the newer India-Korea CEPA and the Japan-India CEPA comprehensively covers three Singapore issues. While there is no separate chapter on government procurement in India-Korea CEPA, there is a cooperation provision on government procurement that opens the door for liberalisation in this difficult area. Another four of India?s FTAs, including the South Asia Free Trade Area (SAFTA), only cover trade facilitation, while the India-Singapore CECA covers both trade facilitation and investment. China?s and India?s remaining FTAs exclude the Singapore issues altogether.

With little end in sight for the decade-long Doha Round trade talks, FTAs are here to stay in Asia. China and India, like many Asian economies, are increasingly adopting a multi-track trade policy of multilateralism and regionalism. It is vital to ensure that the giants? FTAs are a tool to further multilateral liberalisation as well as Asia-wide liberalisation. In this vein, a focus on deep integration beyond goods in FTAs is the key. FTAs are a relatively recent phenomenon in Asia and the giants? FTA strategies appear to be in the formative stages. It was perhaps inevitable that the early FTA focus was on shallower rather than deep integration as the giants learnt to manage FTAs and balance competing business interests. Encouragingly, there are signs that the giants have moved towards deeper FTAs over time emphasising services and new trade issues. Nonetheless, room exists for improving the depth of China and India?s future FTAs.

Dent, CM (2006), New Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific: Towards Lattice Regionalism, Palgrave Macmillan Press.

Plummer, M (2007), ?Best Practices in Regional Trade Agreements: An Application to Asia?, World Economy, 30(12):1771-1796.

Suominen, K (2009), ?The Changing Anatomy of Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia?, Journal of East Asian Studies, 9(1):29-56.

Wignaraja, G (2011), ?Economic Reforms, Regionalism and Exports: Comparing China and India?, East-West Center, Policy Studies, 60.

Wignaraja, G (2012), ?Commercial Policy and Experience in the Giants: China and India?, in ME Kreinin and MG Plummer (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Commercial Policy, Oxford University Press.

Wignaraja, G and D Lazaro (2010), ?North?South vs. South?South Asian FTAs: Trends, Compatibilities, and Ways Forward?, UNU-CRIS Working Papers W-2010/3, United Nations University Comparative Regional Integration Studies: Bruges (Belgium).

Source: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/8199

bloom box fat tuesday obama sweet home chicago accenture match play george washington carver king cake mardi gras

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Apple's MobileMe closes, as does Kodak Gallery

18 hrs.

Suzanne Choney

If you?use Apple's MobileMe or the Kodak Gallery, it's moving time for you. Apple announced a year ago it would shutter MobileMe June 30, 2012, with users likely choosing Apple's iCloud as their new home.

Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy, sold its online photo site, Kodak Gallery, to Shutterfly. The gallery?shuts down sometime today, and Shutterfly is in the process of transferring an estimated 5 billion photos from Kodak's site to its own.

Victor Cho, Kodak Gallery general manager, said in an online posting that Shutterfly will email customers about the status of their photos throughout the transfer process, which will be "secure and smooth, but will take some time."

While photos will move to Shutterfly, projects, such as Photo Books and Calendars, will not be moved over, and users need to "complete and purchase any projects" before noon July 2, he said.?

If you have questions, Kodak has a Q-and-A FAQ page here.

Jeffrey Weber, a Shutterfly spokesoman, told the Los Angeles Times that the company expects to have the very last files moved over by November, although the photos will remain on Kodak's servers for awhile.?

Meanwhile, with the shutdown of MobileMe, users do not have access to their old?galleries.?But, Apple says, "for a limited time, you can still save copies of all photos and movies published to your gallery."

If you have a Mac, the company says, "it is likely that most of your gallery photos are already in iPhoto. If not, you can sync your gallery photos to your iPhoto library. You can also download your photos and movies directly from the Web."

You can get more answers to questions about the MobileMe transition here.

In addition to the services shown in Apple's chart, the company says iCloud includes these as well:

iTunes in the Cloud, Photo Stream, Documents in the Cloud, Automatic?downloads and purchase history for apps and books; backup and restore; and Find My Friends.

If you haven't had a chance to take stock of what you have and where it is, the sooner the better no matter whether you are using MobileMe or Kodak Gallery, as the clock is ticking.?

Check out Technolog, Gadgetbox, Digital Life and In-Game on Facebook,?and on Twitter, follow Suzanne Choney.

Source: http://www.technolog.msnbc.msn.com/technology/technolog/apples-mobileme-closes-does-kodak-gallery-858286

sickle cell trait michigan football michigan football sugar bowl mild kidney failure presidential candidates celebrity wife swap

Pakistan opens Afghan supply line after US apology

FILE - In this June 12, 2012 file photo, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks at the State Department in Washington. The Obama administration says Pakistan is reopening supply lines into Afghanistan after the U.S. issued an apology for the November killing of 24 Pakistani troops in a NATO airstrike. Clinton says she told Pakistan?s foreign minister in a telephone conversation that the U.S. is ?sorry for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military.? She says both sides acknowledged mistakes that resulted in deaths. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) ? The Obama administration said Tuesday that Pakistan was reopening its supply lines into Afghanistan, after the U.S. belatedly issued an apology for the November killing of 24 Pakistani troops in a NATO airstrike.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton expressed her condolences for the deaths in a telephone conversation with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar. The incident badly damaged already strained relations between the two countries and forced the U.S. and its allies to send supplies via costlier northern routes into Afghanistan.

"We are sorry for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military," Clinton said in a statement, recounting her discussion with Khar. "I offered our sincere condolences to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives. Foreign Minister Khar and I acknowledged the mistakes that resulted in the loss of Pakistani military lives."

It is the first time any U.S. official has formally apologized for the deaths, a step hotly debated within the Obama administration and one demanded by Pakistan while its supply routes remained closed for seven months. It came as key Pakistani civilian and military leaders were meeting Tuesday evening in Islamabad to discuss whether to reopen NATO supply routes.

Clinton said a decision had been reached.

"I am pleased that Foreign Minister Khar has informed me that the ground supply lines into Afghanistan are opening," Clinton said. She said Pakistan won't charge any transit fee, the subject of an earlier negotiation, and that the reopening would help the U.S. draw down its war in Afghanistan "at a much lower cost."

The U.S. government has never paid any transit fees directly. Pakistan charges the trucking companies for transit and the U.S. accounts for those fees in its contracts with those companies, so it pays indirectly.

"This is a tangible demonstration of Pakistan's support for a secure, peaceful, and prosperous Afghanistan and our shared objectives in the region," Clinton said, calling the agreement "critically important to the men and women who are fighting terrorism and extremism in Afghanistan."

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta also welcomed Pakistan's decision.

"As I have made clear, we remain committed to improving our partnership with Pakistan and to working closely together as our two nations confront common security challenges in the region," he said.

The dispute over the supply lines had plunged relations between Pakistan and the U.S. to new lows, coming after a CIA contractor killed two Pakistanis and the unilateral U.S. raid on Osama bin Laden's Pakistani compound. Tensions are compounded by the U.S. suspicion that Pakistan supports the Taliban, making the Afghanistan war unwinnable.

Domestic concerns on both sides made an agreement more difficult.

Pakistan's government, worried about the inevitable political backlash from reopening the route, given the high level of anti-American sentiment in the country, held out for a higher transit tax and a clear apology for the November incident near the Afghan border.

The Obama administration, in the midst of an election year, expressed regret but dug in its heels over the word "sorry," apparently fearful it would open the president to criticism from Republicans angry over Pakistan's links with militants fighting in Afghanistan.

With the supply lines closed, the U.S. has been forced to use more costly transportation routes through Russia and Central Asia. Panetta has estimated the cost at an extra $100 million a month. He warned that it could get more expensive as the U.S. starts to withdraw equipment in advance of the 2014 troop drawdown in Afghanistan.

According to the Pentagon, the agreement is likely to free up millions of dollars in coalition support claims that can now be paid to Pakistan. The Defense Department must notify Congress first. There have been no decisions yet on any future claims.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-07-03-US-Pakistan/id-9a4b4516b1824a7ab6ccbf96c6690321

kyra sedgwick honor killings mary tyler moore x games pro bowl pro bowl 2012 rick santorum daughter